Live instructor-led | Classroom & Live Online Available  |  View Dates & Options →
Strategy & Business Skills  ·  INF-01

PPP and Public-Private Partnership Project Development

View Dates & Options
Live instructor-led  |  Private cohorts available  |  Group booking options available

Strong PPP projects begin with a public-service need, a credible commercial structure and disciplined decisions about value, affordability and risk.

Course Overview

This program develops the management capability required to shape a PPP opportunity before procurement begins. It helps participants distinguish a genuinely suitable PPP from a project that should follow another delivery route, and it connects policy objectives to commercial, financial and implementation realities.

For private cohorts, examples, decision tools and scenarios can be adapted to the organization’s sector, operating model, governance and current portfolio while protecting confidential information.

Regional application: Particularly relevant to Saudi Arabia and the wider GCC, with strong application to infrastructure and public-service programs across Africa and Asia.

B2B course snapshot

Where this program fits

Best fit

Government entities, infrastructure agencies, project sponsors, finance teams, transaction teams and managers involved in PPP development

Delivery

Live classroom, live online or private in-house. Depth and schedule are tailored to the cohort.

Built around

Project screening, strategic case, affordability, commercial structure, risk allocation, procurement route and implementation readiness

Take back to work

A PPP project-development framework and decision checklist for a live or proposed project

Built for Corporate and Government Cohorts

Private delivery can be aligned to participant roles, internal terminology, governance, real workplace situations and current enterprise priorities. The course can also sit inside a broader academy or capability pathway.

What Participants Will Learn

Assess whether a project is suitable for PPP development
Frame the strategic and service case before financial structuring
Test affordability, bankability and commercial logic at a management level
Allocate risk to the party best able to manage it
Build a procurement and governance route that supports competition and delivery
Prepare decision-ready recommendations for sponsors and approval bodies

Business Problems This Program Is Designed to Address

PPP is treated as a financing labelParticipants learn to test the delivery model against service, value and risk rather than starting with a preferred structure.
Projects enter procurement before they are readyThe course introduces readiness gates for scope, demand, land, approvals, data and stakeholder alignment.
Risk is transferred on paper but remains unmanagedParticipants test whether allocation is realistic, priced and operationally controllable.
Approval packs contain detail but weak decisionsThe program focuses analysis on the decisions sponsors and approval bodies actually need to make.

Course Outline

Module 1: PPP Strategy and Project Suitability

Apply ppp strategy and project suitability to a realistic enterprise context.

  • Policy objective
  • Service requirement
  • Delivery options
  • Suitability tests
Module 2: Strategic and Economic Case

Apply strategic and economic case to a realistic enterprise context.

  • Need and scope
  • Options
  • Benefits
  • Constraints
Module 3: Commercial and Financial Structure

Apply commercial and financial structure to a realistic enterprise context.

  • Revenue or payment model
  • Affordability
  • Bankability
  • Commercial interfaces
Module 4: Risk Allocation and Value

Apply risk allocation and value to a realistic enterprise context.

  • Risk identification
  • Allocation principles
  • Pricing consequences
  • Residual public risk
Module 5: Procurement and Market Engagement

Apply procurement and market engagement to a realistic enterprise context.

  • Market sounding
  • Qualification
  • Bid evaluation
  • Governance
Module 6: Readiness, Approvals and Implementation

Apply readiness, approvals and implementation to a realistic enterprise context.

  • Readiness gates
  • Approval pack
  • Transaction plan
  • Implementation governance

Applied Practice and Scenario Work

Participants use realistic situations to practise analysis, judgement, stakeholder communication and workplace application. The objective is to improve decision quality, not simply knowledge recall.

A ministry has a strong infrastructure need but uncertain demandParticipants decide what evidence is required before selecting a PPP structure.
A proposed risk matrix pushes almost every risk to the private partnerParticipants test which risks are genuinely transferable and which will simply be priced back.
The market shows interest but requests major changes to payment mechanicsParticipants distinguish productive market feedback from erosion of the original public objective.
A project has political urgency but unresolved land and approval dependenciesParticipants create a readiness decision rather than treating procurement as the cure for incomplete preparation.

Practical Tools and Work Products

01 PPP suitability screen
02 Project readiness checklist
03 Risk-allocation matrix
04 Affordability and value decision canvas
05 Market-engagement plan
06 Sponsor decision brief

What Strong Practice Looks Like

PPP is a delivery model, not a substitute for a clear service need or an executable project.

Value depends on whole-life incentives, realistic risk allocation and credible competition, not on maximizing nominal risk transfer.

Early market engagement is useful when it informs structure without pre-committing the public buyer to one bidder or solution.

A disciplined readiness gate protects both the public sponsor and the market from avoidable procurement failure.

Questions Participants Learn to Ask

01

Why is PPP the right delivery route for this project?

02

Which risks can the private partner actually control?

03

What evidence supports affordability and market appetite?

04

What must be resolved before procurement can credibly begin?

Implementation Pitfalls and Cross-Functional Interfaces

Capability in this topic depends on how decisions move across organizational boundaries. Private cohorts can map where ownership, evidence, incentives or escalation currently break down and use those interfaces as part of the learning design.

  • Policy and service owners for outcomes and scope
  • Finance and treasury for affordability and fiscal implications
  • Legal and procurement teams for transaction design
  • Technical and delivery teams for requirements and readiness

A common implementation mistake is to introduce a framework without changing the management routine around it. Participants identify where the tool will be used, who needs to be involved, what evidence is required and what decision should become different after application.

Designing a Private Cohort Around Real Work

Before delivery, the sponsor can define participant roles, current maturity, recurring decisions and one or two practical outputs that would be useful after the program. Cases can then be calibrated to the organization’s context without turning the course into a review of confidential matters.

Advanced Application Considerations

Advanced application should test project suitability before transaction design, distinguish affordability from financing availability, examine whether proposed risk transfer is genuinely controllable, and use market engagement to challenge assumptions without allowing the procurement strategy to be shaped by one bidder. Senior participants should also consider the institutional capability needed to govern the project after award, because a credible PPP case depends on long-term public-side contract management as much as transaction execution.

  • Project readiness should be evidenced across scope, approvals, land, demand, data and sponsor governance before procurement is treated as the next step.
  • Risk allocation should be tested against control, pricing and operational reality rather than maximized for appearance.
  • Affordability, value and bankability should be considered together because a structure can be financeable without being sustainable for the public sponsor.
  • Market feedback should inform the structure while preserving competition, transparency and the original public-service objective.

How Participants Work During the Program

The program is designed around applied management work rather than lecture alone. Participants move between short concept inputs, structured diagnosis, scenario analysis, decision exercises and practical work products. Where a private cohort is used, the facilitator can calibrate the examples to the organization’s terminology, governance and operating environment without requiring confidential information to be exposed.

Diagnose

Identify the current decision, process or governance gap.

Apply

Use the framework on realistic or live work.

Challenge

Test assumptions, evidence, trade-offs and stakeholder consequences.

Transfer

Leave with a work product and a clear next application.

Manager Reinforcement and Evidence of Application

For corporate and government cohorts, reinforcement is strongest when managers know which decisions or work products the program is intended to improve. Managers do not need to reteach the content. A short follow-up can ask what tool was used, what evidence changed the participant’s judgement, what stakeholder response followed and what should be adjusted next time.

Useful evidence can include clearer decision papers, more consistent governance records, stronger escalation, better-prepared stakeholder conversations and reuse of course tools in normal work. Attendance alone should not be treated as proof of business impact.

Capability Maturity and Leadership Decisions

Organizations at an early stage may need common terminology, minimum controls and basic ownership before introducing more sophisticated techniques. More mature teams should use the course to challenge exceptions, integrate several functions and improve the quality of senior decisions. The private-cohort design can therefore vary the level of complexity without changing the underlying professional discipline.

A useful maturity test is whether the organization can explain who owns the decision, what evidence is required, when escalation is triggered and how lessons feed back into the next cycle. Where these questions are unclear, capability usually depends too heavily on individual experience.

Who Should Attend

  • PPP and privatization teams
  • Government project sponsors and program managers
  • Infrastructure finance and commercial professionals
  • Advisers and managers supporting PPP transactions

Organizational Benefits

  • Improve project-selection discipline
  • Strengthen readiness before procurement
  • Improve risk and commercial decisions
  • Create clearer sponsor and approval governance
  • Build internal PPP development capability

Delivery and Pricing

The program is live and instructor-led. It can be delivered in the classroom, live online or in-house. Duration is flexible and should reflect participant level, selected depth, organizational objectives and the amount of applied practice required.

Public and private pricing: current public fees are confirmed with scheduled cohorts. Private and customized programs are quoted according to cohort size, location, scope and customization. Request a proposal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can this be delivered privately for one organization?

Yes. Private cohorts can be calibrated to participant roles, governance, sector context and priority scenarios.

Is the duration fixed?

No. Delivery depth and schedule are adapted to the cohort and learning objective.

Can we use our own scenarios?

Yes. Organization-relevant situations can be used while protecting confidential information.

How is the course adapted for different sectors?

The core professional principles remain consistent, while scenarios, terminology, stakeholder roles and work products can be adjusted to the organization’s sector and operating environment.

What can participants take back to work?

Participants leave with practical tools, decision frameworks and work products that can be applied to live responsibilities rather than a purely academic set of notes.

Can this course sit inside a broader capability academy?

Yes. It can be combined with adjacent programs into a role-based, functional or leadership pathway with workplace application between modules.

Related Programs

Explore related Training Bundles and Corporate Academies.

Build a Cohort Around the Capability Need

TheSkillGrid can combine this course with adjacent programs into a coherent corporate or government capability pathway.

Discuss a Program

Upcoming Dates & Venues

No sessions currently scheduled.
Request course availability with your preferred date, location and group size. We will confirm available public-session and private-team options before any booking or payment.

Ready to Take the Next Step?

Register your interest for a public session or request private in-house delivery for your team.